"We have been working closely with Apple for the past year to ensure a timely delivery of our new releases. Now Thursby has issued a press release stating that a Tiger-compatible release will be issued in August. Please check our website after the coming weekend.ĭAVE compatibility coming in August We previously noted issues Thursby's DAVE 5.1 under Mac OS X 10.4. "We have addressed the Tiger-specific issues and will have more information once Mac OS X 10.4 is officially released. ![]() In certain configurations, DiskWarrior will return the message: 'This disk appears to have a newer version of the Mac OS disk format than this version of DiskWarrior.' Older versions of DiskWarrior may simply indicate that the disk cannot be repaired. "In many instances DiskWarrior will rebuild the Tiger directory successfully. Of course, it is always recommended that you rebuild your directory before doing any operating system install, especially a major upgrade such as 10.3.x to 10.4.x. "The current version of DiskWarrior (3.0.2) will not cause any harm when run on a disk with Mac OS X 10.4.x (Tiger) installed. ![]() We've now received official word from Alsoft about Tiger compatibility. Both drives work as a third set of backups after I reformatted them.Official word on DiskWarrior compatibility Yesterday we reported on some potential issues with the current version of Alsoft's popular DiskWarrior utility and Mac OS X 10.4. Still not sure what caused the drive failure. It then took about 37 hours due to slow USB 2 connection from enclosure to computer. I went back to DR3 and for some reason the drive showed up under “Found Files” when I tried either quick/deep scan. I think the same “not readable” error showed up.ĭisk Utility couldn’t even see the drive. The drive did not register or maybe I was too quick to move to the next solution which was to waste $108 on diskwarrior.ĭiskwarrior didn’t even recognize the drive. I removed the drives and put them in an external USB 2 SATA enclosure docking station by BlackX. I will try to convey as much of what I recollect as I was in a little bit frantic when I was trying to find a solution. It would be nice to have software (like the Drobo) that monitors the status of the drives and automatically alerts you if one of the drives goes bad. In other words if you didn't notice the red light on the front of the enclosure you could be at risk. The only downside to this that I can see is that there is no other indicator that the drive has failed that I'm aware of. Once you replace the failed drive, the Guardian Maximus will automatically "rebuild" which means that it will mirror the data onto the replacement drive. If one of the drives fails the indicator for that drive will go red. There are LED indicators for the drive activity of both drives. The drive (enclosure) is relatively quiet. When it comes to speed you have to remember that the data is being written to both 1TB drives at once. I copied a couple of gig to it from my server and speed was acceptable. I connected the drive up via Firewire 800 out of the box and it mounted on the desktop. This drive has USB2, Firewire 800 and Firewire 400 connections on the back and comes with all 3 cables. The idea is that if one drive fails, you would still have everything up to that second on the other drive. With a RAID-1 you have TWO identical hard drives in a case that are writing the data simultaneously to each drive. ![]() OWC carries the NewerTechnology Guardian Maximus line of RAIDs. However, in some cases having an up to date backup could still mean losing hours of work. OK, you've heard me harp on the need to have backups.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |